Introduction: The Significance of Biogas Desulfurization and an Overview of the Chelated Iron Process
Biogas is increasingly recognized as a vital renewable energy source, offering a sustainable alternative to traditional fossil fuels.(1) Produced through the anaerobic digestion of organic materials, biogas primarily consists of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2).(3) However, it often contains impurities, most notably hydrogen sulfide (H2S), which can significantly hinder its utilization.(3) The presence of H2S poses several challenges, including its toxicity to human health, its corrosive nature that can damage equipment such as engines and pipelines, and its potential to form sulfur dioxide (SO2) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4) upon combustion, contributing to environmental issues like acid rain.(1) Therefore, the efficient removal of H2S from biogas is a critical step in ensuring its quality and maximizing its potential as a clean energy source.(1)
Among the various technologies available for biogas desulfurization, the chelated iron process stands out as a liquid redox technology that leverages the oxidation-reduction properties of chelated iron in an aqueous medium to scrub H2S from the gas stream.(1) This process offers a unique advantage by directly converting H2S into elemental sulfur, a less hazardous byproduct that can even possess commercial value.(1) By utilizing a regenerative approach, the chelated iron process aims to provide a cost-effective and environmentally sound solution for biogas purification, addressing the growing need for efficient H2S removal in the renewable energy sector.
Fundamentals of the Chelated Iron Biogas Desulfurization Process
The chelated iron process for biogas desulfurization involves a series of fundamental chemical reactions that facilitate the removal of hydrogen sulfide and the regeneration of the active iron species.1 The process begins with the absorption of H2S gas into an aqueous scrubbing solution that contains ferric chelate (Fe3+L).(1)
This initial step can be represented by the equilibrium:
H2S (gas) ⇌ H2S (aq)
Once dissolved in the aqueous phase, the hydrogen sulfide undergoes dissociation, forming bisulfide ions (HS-).(1)
This dissociation occurs in two stages, with the first stage being more significant under typical operating conditions:
H2S (aq) ⇌ H+ + HS- (pKa ≈ 7.0)
The core of the desulfurization process lies in the subsequent reaction where the bisulfide ions (HS-) are oxidized by the ferric chelate (Fe3+L). This reaction leads to the formation of elemental sulfur (S) and ferrous chelate (Fe2+L), as shown by the equation:
2Fe3+L + HS- → 2Fe2+L + S + H+ (1)
The production of elemental sulfur in this step is a notable benefit, as it represents a form of sulfur that is less harmful and can be recovered for potential industrial use.(1) For the process to operate continuously, the ferrous chelate (Fe2+L) must be regenerated back to its ferric form (Fe3+L).
This regeneration is achieved through oxidation with oxygen present in the air (1):
4Fe2+L + O2 + 2H+ → 4Fe3+L + 2OH-
The ferric chelate (Fe3+L) acts as the primary oxidizing agent in the desulfurization process and can be considered a pseudo-catalyst because it is regenerated in a cyclic manner, allowing for continuous operation and minimizing the consumption of the iron chelate.(1)
A critical aspect to consider is the impact of carbon dioxide (CO2), a major component of biogas, on the scrubbing solution.(1)
CO2 also gets absorbed into the aqueous solution, following the equilibrium:
CO2 (gas) ⇌ CO2 (aq)
Dissolved CO2 then undergoes hydrolysis and dissociation, which can lead to a decrease in the pH of the solution due to the formation of hydrogen ions (H+):
CO2 (aq) + H2O ⇌ H2CO3
H2CO3 ⇌ H+ + HCO3- (pKa ≈ 6.4)
HCO3- ⇌ H+ + CO32- (pKa ≈ 10.3)
The decrease in pH can negatively affect the absorption rate of H2S, as a slightly alkaline environment generally favors the formation of bisulfide ions. Therefore, to maintain optimal desulfurization efficiency, it is often necessary to add alkali to the scrubbing solution to neutralize the hydrogen ions produced from both H2S and CO2 absorption.(1)
The mechanism of H2S absorption and conversion in the chelated iron process typically involves bringing the biogas into contact with the chelated iron solution in packed towers or scrubbers.(8) These gas-liquid contactors are designed to maximize the surface area for interaction between the gas and liquid phases, thereby enhancing the absorption rate of H2S.(8) The choice of chelating agent, such as EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), NTA (nitrilotriacetic acid), or DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid), plays a crucial role in the process.(1) These agents are essential for maintaining the solubility of iron ions over a wide pH range and preventing the precipitation of insoluble iron sulfides or hydroxides, which would hinder the desulfurization process.(1) As the reaction proceeds, elemental sulfur is formed within the solution in the form of fine particles.(6) The physical characteristics of these sulfur particles are important for the subsequent separation stage.
The regeneration of the iron chelate solution is a continuous process that ensures the long-term viability of the desulfurization system.(8) The ferrous chelate solution, which is formed after the reaction with H2S, is pumped to a separate unit called a regenerator. This can be a packed column or an aerated tank designed to facilitate contact between the liquid and air.(8) Air is introduced into the regenerator, typically in a countercurrent flow to the liquid, to maximize the oxygen transfer for the oxidation of Fe2+ back to Fe3+.(8) The regenerated ferric chelate solution is then separated and recycled back to the absorber to continue the H2S removal process.(8) To prevent operational issues, such as blockages in the regenerator, it is often necessary to remove the elemental sulfur from the liquid stream before it enters the regeneration unit.(8) Efficient sulfur removal at this stage is crucial for maintaining the smooth and continuous operation of the entire desulfurization system.
Typical Operating Conditions for Chelated Iron Biogas Desulfurization Systems
The efficient performance of a chelated iron biogas desulfurization system is highly dependent on maintaining optimal operating conditions, including temperature, pressure, and pH.(12) The temperature at which the process is carried out generally ranges from ambient conditions (approximately 20°C) up to 60°C.(1) Some studies have even explored the effectiveness of the process at higher temperatures, up to 90°C, indicating a potential for operation across a broader range.(12) Temperature influences the kinetics of the chemical reactions involved in both H2S absorption and iron regeneration, as well as the solubility of gases in the liquid phase.(12) Optimizing the temperature is therefore essential for achieving maximum efficiency.
In terms of pressure, chelated iron desulfurization typically operates at low or atmospheric pressure.(1) This low-pressure operation can be advantageous as it reduces the capital costs associated with high-pressure equipment.(13) While most applications favor atmospheric pressure, some specific designs or integration with other processes might involve slightly elevated pressures.
The pH of the scrubbing solution is a critical parameter that significantly affects the efficiency of H2S removal.(1) The optimal pH range is generally between 6 and 9, although this can vary depending on the specific chelating agent used and the overall process design.(1) Maintaining a slightly alkaline environment is usually preferred as it promotes the dissociation of H2S into bisulfide ions, which readily react with the ferric chelate.(1) However, as mentioned earlier, the absorption of CO2 from the biogas can lead to a decrease in pH, necessitating careful monitoring and adjustment, often through the addition of alkali.(1)
Other important operating parameters include the concentration of the iron chelate in the scrubbing solution and the flow rates of both the biogas and the liquid.(6) Typical iron chelate concentrations can range from approximately 0.10 M to 0.4 M.(6) A higher concentration of the iron chelate generally increases the capacity of the solution to remove H2S.(12) The flow rates of the gas and liquid streams need to be carefully optimized to ensure sufficient contact time for efficient mass transfer and reaction to occur.(6) The ratio between the liquid and gas flow rates is a key factor in determining the overall H2S removal efficiency.(6)
Technology Review and Comparative Analysis of the Chelated Iron Process
The chelated iron process offers several compelling advantages for biogas desulfurization.(6) It is known for its high H2S removal efficiency, often capable of achieving very low outlet concentrations, even below 1 ppm when combined with a downstream polishing step.(6) The process is continuous and regenerative, which significantly minimizes the consumption of chemicals compared to non-regenerative methods.(3) A key benefit is the production of elemental sulfur as a byproduct, which is generally non-hazardous and has the potential to be sold or used as a fertilizer.(1) Furthermore, the operation at ambient temperature and low pressure can lead to reduced energy costs and lower capital expenditure compared to processes requiring extreme conditions.(1) The chelated iron process is also capable of handling a wide range of H2S concentrations in the incoming biogas, making it versatile for various biogas sources.(1)
However, the chelated iron process also has certain disadvantages and limitations.(8) The chelating agents used in the process can be subject to degradation over time due to oxidation or the presence of other components in the biogas, requiring periodic monitoring and replenishment.(8) The presence of other contaminants in the biogas stream, such as ammonia or certain volatile organic compounds, might interfere with the process or accelerate the degradation of the chelate.(2) The need for pH control and the potential addition of alkali can increase the operational complexity and costs associated with the process.(1) The elemental sulfur produced is often in the form of fine particles, which can sometimes be challenging to separate efficiently from the solution.(6) Economic analyses have also indicated that the unit desulfurization cost for the chelated iron process might be higher compared to some in-situ biological methods.(13)
To provide a broader perspective, it is useful to compare the chelated iron process with other commonly used biogas desulfurization technologies: Biochemical Process, amine scrubbing, and activated carbon.
Biochemical Process: This is a biological process that utilizes naturally occurring microorganisms, typically sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, to oxidize H2S to elemental sulfur under halo-alkaline conditions.(2) Similar to the chelated iron process, Biochemical process offers high removal efficiency and produces elemental sulfur.(18) It also operates at ambient conditions and can have lower operating costs compared to some chemical methods, with no need for catalyst replacement.(18) However, as a biological process, Biochemical Process can be sensitive to operating parameters such as pH, temperature, oxygen levels, and nutrient availability.(19) It might also have turndown limitations and slower response times to changes in H2S load compared to chemical methods like the chelated iron process.(65). We have dedicated ariticle about Biochemical process which can be refered using below link for additional details.
https://www.avenirenergia.net/2025/04/biochemical-hydrogen-sulfide-removal.html
Amine Scrubbing: This is a chemical absorption method that uses amine solutions to remove both H2S and CO2 from gas streams.(2) Amine scrubbing offers high removal efficiency for both these acid gases and is a well-established technology.(2) However, it typically involves high energy consumption for the regeneration of the amine solution, which requires heating.(2) There can also be issues with amine degradation, corrosion, and potential methane losses.(2) Furthermore, pretreatment might be necessary to remove oxygen, which can degrade the amine solution.(2) While effective for removing multiple impurities, amine scrubbing can be more energy-intensive and operationally complex compared to the chelated iron process.
Activated Carbon: This method relies on the physical adsorption of H2S onto the surface of activated carbon media.(3) Activated carbon systems are relatively simple to operate and can achieve very low outlet H2S concentrations.(3) The initial capital cost is also generally low.(3) However, activated carbon is a non-regenerative sorbent, meaning the saturated media must be periodically replaced and disposed of, which can lead to significant operating costs, especially for high H2S loads.(3) The performance of activated carbon can also be affected by the moisture content of the biogas.(3) Compared to the regenerative nature of the chelated iron process, activated carbon generates solid waste and might be less cost-effective for long-term operation with high H2S concentrations.
Table 1: Comparison of Biogas Desulfurization Technologies
Maturity and Commercial Availability of Chelated Iron Biogas Desulfurization Technology
The chelated iron process for gas desulfurization has been commercially available and utilized in various industries for several decades.(12) While initially developed and widely adopted in the natural gas processing industry for removing H2S from natural gas streams, its application has expanded to include biogas treatment, indicating a growing recognition of its benefits in the renewable energy sector.(6) This broadening adoption signifies a level of maturity and adaptability of the technology to different gas compositions and requirements.
Several notable companies offer chelated iron desulfurization systems for biogas applications.(9) Merichem Technologies, for example, markets its LO-CAT® technology, which is a patented liquid redox system using a chelated iron solution to convert H2S to elemental sulfur.(9) Pyro Green-Gas Technologies also provides an ISET Iron Chelate Process specifically recommended for biogas with high H2S concentrations.(10) Mingshuo, a company based in China, offers various chelated iron-based desulfurization scrubbers designed for biogas projects, highlighting the technology's global presence.(68) The existence of multiple suppliers in the market suggests that the technology is commercially viable and competitive, offering a range of solutions tailored to different needs and scales of operation.
Indian Institute of sciences (IISC) Banglore also developed and patented iron chelate based process in India which is offered through various companies via technology license. Mithra Increst Private Limited is the concern company operating out of Bangalore who can contacted for license of the said technology.
Examples of existing installations and case studies further attest to the commercial maturity and practical application of the chelated iron process in biogas treatment.(7) Pilot-scale studies have demonstrated high H2S removal efficiencies from biogas generated at landfills, showcasing the technology's effectiveness under real-world conditions.(7) The application of chelated iron processes in industries with high H2S content in biogas, such as those processing wastewater from concentrated rubber latex, also highlights its capability to handle challenging scenarios.(12) These examples, along with the established presence of commercial suppliers, confirm that the chelated iron process is a mature and readily available technology for biogas desulfurization.
Recent Advancements and Modifications in the Chelated Iron Biogas Desulfurization Process
Ongoing research and development continue to drive advancements and modifications in the chelated iron biogas desulfurization process.(14) One area of focus is the development of enhanced catalysts and chelating agents aimed at improving the efficiency and stability of the process.(14) For instance, studies have explored the use of dual-ligand iron chelates, such as those composed of citric acid and EDTA, to enhance the oxidative degradation stability of the catalyst.(14) This research seeks to address the limitation of chelate degradation and further optimize the performance of the desulfurization process.
Another significant trend is the integration of the chelated iron process with other technologies to achieve enhanced sulfur recovery or even energy generation.(14) Novel approaches include fuel cell-assisted processes that utilize a specialized anode to speed up the electro-oxidation of the reduced iron chelate, simultaneously recovering electricity and producing elemental sulfur from H2S.(14) The use of rotating packed bed (RPB) reactors for catalytic oxidative absorption of H2S with ferric chelate absorbent represents another advancement, offering high H2S removal efficiency in a compact footprint.(14) These innovations aim to make the process more efficient, cost-effective, and potentially generate additional value streams from the biogas treatment.
Furthermore, there is a continuous focus on improving the overall cost-effectiveness and reducing the environmental footprint of the chelated iron process.(7) Research efforts are directed towards optimizing operating conditions, minimizing chemical consumption, and enhancing the recovery of elemental sulfur to make the technology more economically attractive and environmentally sustainable for widespread adoption in the biogas industry. These recent advancements and modifications indicate a dynamic field with ongoing efforts to refine and enhance the chelated iron process for biogas desulfurization.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Using Chelated Iron for Biogas Desulfurization
The cost-effectiveness of using the chelated iron process for biogas desulfurization is a crucial factor for its adoption and depends on both capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operational expenditure (OPEX).(7) The initial investment costs (CAPEX) for a chelated iron desulfurization system typically include the absorber unit, the regenerator, the sulfur separation unit (such as a filter press or centrifuge), pumps, piping, and control systems.68 When compared to other desulfurization technologies, the CAPEX for a chelated iron system might be lower than more complex technologies like amine scrubbing, which requires extensive regeneration equipment, but potentially higher than simpler methods such as activated carbon adsorption or in-situ chemical treatments.(9)
The operational expenditure (OPEX) of a chelated iron system involves several factors.(7) These include the cost of the chelated iron solution itself and the expense of any makeup chemicals required, such as alkali for pH control and stabilizing agents to minimize chelate degradation.(1) Energy consumption for pumping the liquid solution between the absorber and regenerator, as well as for supplying air to the regenerator, also contributes to the OPEX.(7) Costs associated with the separation, handling, and potential disposal of the recovered elemental sulfur must also be considered.(6) Regular maintenance of the system components will also incur operational costs.(3)
A significant factor that can positively impact the cost-effectiveness of the chelated iron process is the potential revenue generated from the sale or use of the recovered elemental sulfur.(1) Depending on its purity and market conditions, this byproduct can offset some of the operating costs, making the overall process more economically viable.(13) Compared to other desulfurization technologies, the regenerative nature of the chelated iron process generally leads to lower OPEX than non-regenerative methods like activated carbon, which requires continuous replacement of the media.(9) It can also be more cost-effective than energy-intensive processes like amine scrubbing, especially for biogas streams with moderate to high H2S concentrations.(9) However, very low-cost in-situ biological or chemical methods might have a lower OPEX in certain applications.(13)
Environmental Impact Assessment of the Chelated Iron Biogas Desulfurization Process
The use of the chelated iron process for biogas desulfurization offers several environmental benefits.(7) Primarily, it significantly reduces the emission of hydrogen sulfide from biogas, thereby preventing the formation of sulfur dioxide (SO2) upon combustion, which is a major contributor to acid rain and other air pollution problems.(1) The effective removal of this harmful pollutant is a key environmental advantage of the technology.
Furthermore, the chelated iron process produces elemental sulfur as a byproduct, which is considerably less harmful than metal sulfides generated by some other chemical scrubbing methods or the spent adsorbents from processes like activated carbon.1 Elemental sulfur can be relatively inert and has potential applications as a fertilizer or in other industrial processes, making its disposal or reuse more environmentally friendly.(13)
Compared to some other wet scrubbing technologies, the chelated iron process aims for a closed-loop operation with minimal liquid waste streams.(9) The regeneration of the iron chelate solution allows for its continuous reuse, reducing the need for large volumes of fresh water and minimizing the discharge of wastewater, which is beneficial from an environmental perspective.9
However, it is important to consider the potential environmental impact associated with the chelated iron solution itself.(7) The chelating agents used, such as EDTA, can persist in the environment and potentially remobilize heavy metals if not properly managed.(7) Therefore, careful operation and maintenance of the system are necessary to prevent any leakage or release of the chelated iron solution or its degradation products into the environment.(7)
On a positive note, the chelated iron process typically operates at ambient temperatures and low pressures, which results in lower energy consumption compared to high-temperature processes like amine scrubbing.(9) This lower energy footprint contributes to a reduced overall environmental impact of the desulfurization process.
Conclusion and Future Outlook for Chelated Iron Biogas Desulfurization
The chelated iron process stands as a robust and effective technology for the removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas, offering high removal efficiencies and the valuable byproduct of elemental sulfur. Its regenerative nature leads to lower chemical consumption compared to non-regenerative methods, and its operation at ambient conditions can be energy-efficient. The technology has achieved commercial maturity with several suppliers and existing installations worldwide, catering to various biogas sources and H2S concentrations.
Despite its advantages, the chelated iron process requires careful management of operating conditions, particularly pH, and attention to potential chelate degradation. While generally cost-effective, its economics can be influenced by factors such as the scale of operation, the concentration of H2S in the biogas, and the market value of the recovered sulfur.
The future outlook for chelated iron biogas desulfurization appears promising. Ongoing research is focused on enhancing catalyst stability, improving process efficiency through integration with other technologies, and further reducing costs and environmental impact. As the demand for biogas as a renewable energy source continues to grow, and as environmental regulations become more stringent, the chelated iron process is well-positioned to play a significant role in ensuring the quality and sustainable utilization of biogas. For biogas plant operators considering H2S removal, the chelated iron process presents a viable option, particularly for applications requiring high removal efficiency and the potential for sulfur recovery. Careful evaluation of site-specific conditions, biogas composition, and economic factors will be crucial in selecting and implementing the most appropriate desulfurization technology.
Works cited
1. ijnrd.org, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2411171.pdf
2. A Review of Biogas Utilisation, Purification and Upgrading Technologies - ResearchGate, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312178933_A_Review_of_Biogas_Utilisation_Purification_and_Upgrading_Technologies
3. Biogas Desulphurisation: Which Technology is Best for your Installation?, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://biogasworld.com/news/biogas-desulphurisation-which-technology-is-best-for-your-installation/
4. Biogas upgrading Evaluation of methods for H2Sremoval - Teknologisk Institut, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.teknologisk.dk/_/media/60599_Biogas+upgrading.+Evaluation+of+methods+for+H2S+removal.pdf
5. Biogas impurities: environmental and health implications, removal technologies and future perspectives - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9589174/
6. Hydrogen Sulfide Removal from Biogas Using Fe/EDTA Solution ..., accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229976106_Hydrogen_Sulfide_Removal_from_Biogas_Using_FeEDTA_Solution_GasLiquid_Contacting_and_Sulfur_Formation
7. Desulfurization of Biogas from a Closed Landfill under Acidic ... - MDPI, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2305-7084/3/3/71
8. cgpl.iisc.ac.in, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://cgpl.iisc.ac.in/dasappa/img/pdf/papers/Hydrogen%20Sulfide%20removal%20from%20biogas%20by%20ISET%20process%20Proceedings%20of%2014th%20European%20Biomass%20Conference%20&%20Exhibition%20Biomass%20for%20Energy.pdf
9. LO-CAT® | Sulfur Recovery Solution - Merichem Technologies, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://merichemtech.com/sulfur-recovery-with-lo-cat/
10. Pyro Green-Gas Desulfurization :BiogasWorld, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://biogasworld.com/product/biogas-management/gas-pretreatment/pyro-green-gas-desulfurization/
11. Oxidative Absorption of Hydrogen Sulfide using Iron-chelate Based Process, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.omicsonline.org/oxidative-absorption-of-hydrogen-sulfide-using-iron-chelate-based-process-chelate-degradation-2155-9872.1000138.php?aid=7595
12. sjst.psu.ac.th, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://sjst.psu.ac.th/journal/31-2/0125-3395-31-2-195-203.pdf
13. Desulphurisation of Biogas: A Systematic Qualitative and Economic ..., accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2305-7084/3/3/76
14. A critical review on the chelated-iron desulfurization process of fuel ..., accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380836857_A_critical_review_on_the_chelated-iron_desulfurization_process_of_fuel_gas_and_the_prospect_of_high_value-added_utilization_of_sulfur_resources
15. A review on the state-of-the-art of physical/chemical and biological technologies for biogas upgrading, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://uvadoc.uva.es/bitstream/10324/26906/1/review-state-Mu%C3%B1oz-et-al.%202015.pdf
16. new developments of the thiopaq process for the removal of h 2 s from gaseous streams, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/NEW-DEVELOPMENTS-OF-THE-THIOPAQ-PROCESS-FOR-THE-OF-Janssen/e563ce4bdc6fda01d19bb9e68869b374d02e9665
17. A Review of the Thiopaq Process for Biological Hydrogen Sulfide Removal from Sour Gases, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385872383_A_Review_of_the_Thiopaq_Process_for_Biological_Hydrogen_Sulfide_Removal_from_Sour_Gases
18. biological process for h2s removal from gas streams the shell-paques/thiopaq™ gas desulfurization process - CiteSeerX, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=02573951cfb4494855f5514c65626f5db30fc869
19. Biological Process for H~ 2S Removal from Gas Streams: The Shell ..., accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228925849_Biological_Process_for_H_2S_Removal_from_Gas_Streams_The_Shell-PaquesTHIOPAQ_Gas_Desulfurization_Process
20. full-scale expererience with biological biogas desulphurization using the thiopaq technology, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://conferences.aquaenviro.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2018/08/Driessen-W.-Paques-bv-Thiopaq.pdf
21. Direct Conversion of H2S to Sulphur - THIOPAQ | Shell Catalysts & Technologies, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.shell.com/business-customers/catalysts-technologies/licensed-technologies/emissions-standards/thiopaq.html
22. A review on prospects and challenges of biological H2S removal from biogas with focus on biotrickling filtration and microaerobic desulfurization - Biofuel Research Journal, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.biofueljournal.com/article_53413_998256bb6798c8c3ce735118624f844a.pdf
23. block process diagram of the thiopaq process for the treatment of h 2 s containing gas streams. - ResearchGate, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/figure/BLOCK-PROCESS-DIAGRAM-OF-THE-THIOPAQ-PROCESS-FOR-THE-TREATMENT-OF-H-2-S-CONTAINING-GAS_fig1_266041180
24. Biogas purification system THIOPAQ® | Paques Biotechnology, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.paquesglobal.com/products/thiopaq
25. Methods for Suppressing Hydrogen Sulfide in Biological Systems - PMC, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8865628/
26. THIOPAQ O&G Biodesulfurization System - SLB, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.slb.com/products-and-services/innovating-in-oil-and-gas/well-production/processing-and-separation/gas-treatment/thiopaq-o-and-g-biodesulfurization-system
27. Full-scale experience with biological biogas desulfurization using the Thiopaq technology, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://conferences.aquaenviro.co.uk/proceedings/full-scale-experience-with-biological-biogas-desulfurization-using-the-thiopaq-technology/
28. Recent advances in microbial capture of hydrogen sulfide from sour ..., accessed on April 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8518563/
29. archive.epa.gov, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://archive.epa.gov/nrmrl/archive-etv/web/pdf/sriusepaghgvr32.pdf
30. (PDF) Full Scale Experience with Biological Biogas Desulphurization using the THIOPAQ Technology - ResearchGate, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315797390_Full_Scale_Experience_with_Biological_Biogas_Desulphurization_using_the_THIOPAQ_Technology
31. THIOPAQ O&G DESULPHURISATION: THE POWER OF NATURE - Paqell, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://paqell.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Paqell-THIOPAQ-OG-Desulphurisation-Factsheet-1.pdf
32. THIOPAQ O&G Technology Reaps Rewards from Sour Casinghead Gas Stream | SLB, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.slb.com/resource-library/case-study/osf/natco-thiopaq-og-illinois-cs
33. Unexpected Risks of Hydrogen Sulfide at RNG Plants | Biomass Magazine, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://biomassmagazine.com/articles/unexpected-risks-of-hydrogen-sulfide-at-rng-plants
34. NATCO Group, Inc. Paques THIOPAQ - EPA Archives, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://archive.epa.gov/nrmrl/archive-etv/web/pdf/03_vs_thiopaq.pdf
35. (PDF) Anaerobik Biyoteknoloji ve Biyoenerji Üretimi - ResearchGate, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281626833_Anaerobik_Biyoteknoloji_ve_Biyoenerji_Uretimi
36. Environmental Technology - WUR, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.wur.nl/upload_mm/3/3/b/504487b9-5826-4d9a-9b28-43e744aa35e0_Newsletter%20ETE%20June%202018.pdf
37. Deep, cost-effective H2S removal with >98% uptime - Pollution Solutions Online, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.pollutionsolutions-online.com/news/air-clean-up/16/paques/deep-cost-effective-h2s-removal-with-98-uptime/3880
38. What is the difference between heat input and arc energy? - TWI, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.twi-global.com/technical-knowledge/faqs/faq-what-is-the-difference-between-heat-input-and-arc-energy
39. Wastewater Treatment Case Studies - Fluence Corporation, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.fluencecorp.com/cases/wastewater-treatment/
40. THIOPAQ®- Biogas desulfurization - BiogasWorld, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://biogasworld.com/product/biogas-management/gas-pretreatment/paques-thiopaq/
41. ABC Webinar: Biogas Desulfurization Experiences with Thiopaq Scrubbers (Sponsored by Paques) - YouTube, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZkFPgGqHwI
42. Case Studies - World Water Works, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.worldwaterworks.com/resources/case-studies/
43. Biotechnological removal of H2S and thiols from sour gas streams under haloalkaline conditions - ResearchGate, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pawel_Roman/publication/302891279_Biotechnological_removal_of_H2S_and_thiols_from_sour_gas_streams_under_haloalkaline_conditions/links/581c564608ae40da2caae97c/Biotechnological-removal-of-H2S-and-thiols-from-sour-gas-streams-under-haloalkaline-conditions.pdf
44. Arc Energy vs. Heat Input - WDC - Welding Development Centre, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://thewdc.co.uk/arc-energy-and-heat-input/
45. Innovative Wastewater Treatment Case Studies | Vogelsang US, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.vogelsang.info/en-us/segments/wastewater/case-studies
46. Recent Advances in H 2 S Removal from Gas Streams - MDPI, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/5/3217
47. Biogas Desulfurization – Paques - Greene-Tec, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://greene-tec.com/biogas-desulfurization-paques/
48. Thiopaq - Solar Impulse Efficient Solution, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://solarimpulse.com/solutions-explorer/thiopaq
49. The THIOPAQ® process - YouTube, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-x7vSZwSOs
50. Deployment of THIOPAQ technology for Biogas Desulfurization - YouTube, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwMfw1zPfHU
51. Wastewater Treatment Case Studies - Blue River Technologies, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://blueriverdewater.com/wastewater-treatment-case-studies/
52. A novel and cost-effective hydrogen sulfide removal technology using tire derived rubber particles by Andrea Mary Siefers - Iowa State University Digital Repository, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/bitstreams/4c4cad07-aecf-4e28-9c2f-9f37c16030c6/download
53. US EPATest and Quality Assurance Plan - Paques THIOPAQ and Shell-Paques Gas Purification Technology - EPA Archive, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://archive.epa.gov/nrmrl/archive-etv/web/pdf/600etv06028.pdf
54. Case Studies for Water and Wastewater Solutions | Xylem US, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.xylem.com/en-us/support/case-studies-white-papers/
55. About Thiopaq O&G - Paqell, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.paqell.com/thiopaq/
56. Biogas Treatment - Aquatec Maxcon, accessed on April 8, 2025, http://www.aquatecmaxcon.com.au/technologies/industrial-processes/biogas-treatment?type=raw&tmpl=component&print=1&page=
57. Pros and Cons of Different H2S Removal Systems - MV Technologies, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://mvseer.com/comparing-different-h2s-removal-systems-pros-and-cons/
58. ABC Sponsored Webinar: Biogas Desulfurization Experiences with THIOPAQ Scrubbers, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://americanbiogascouncil.org/news-american-biogas-council/abc-sponsored-webinar-biogas-desulfurization-experiences-with-thiopaq-scrubbers/
59. Monitoring Arc energy and heat input! - General Technical knowledge - WordPress.com, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://shipbuildingknowledge.wordpress.com/2019/10/05/monitoring-arc-energy-and-heat-input/
60. Technologies for H2S Control - Solid Waste Association of North America (SWANA), accessed on April 8, 2025, https://swana.org/news/blog/swana-post/swana-blog/2024/03/01/technologies-for-h2s-control-macrotek
61. (PDF) A Retrospection of Hydrogen Sulphide Removal Technologies in Biogas Purification, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350810051_A_Retrospection_of_Hydrogen_Sulphide_Removal_Technologies_in_Biogas_Purification
62. Case Studies on Implementing Low-Cost Modifications to Improve Nutrient Reduction at Wastewater Treatment Plants - Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-08/documents/case_studies_on_implementing_low-cost_modification_to_improve_potw_nutrient_reduction-combined_508_-_august.pdf
63. Minutes of the Assembly Committee on Agriculture, 4-8-1975 - Nevada Legislature, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Division/Research/Library/LegHistory/Minutes/1975/Assembly/Agriculture/4-8-75.pdf
64. Amélioration de l'efficacité du traitement du drainage minier par des matériaux naturels et résiduels modifiés - PolyPublie, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://publications.polymtl.ca/3856/1/2019_IulianaLauraCalugaru.pdf
65. Renewable Natural Gas Hydrogen Sulfide Removal Alternatives - SCS Engineers, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.scsengineers.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/RNG-Works-Presentation-RNG-H2S-Removal-Alternatives-09-10-18-SCS-Engineers.pdf
66. COALTECH 2020 Evaluation Of The Paques Thiopaq Sulphate Removal Process TABLE OF CONTENTS, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://coaltech.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Task-6.9.4-b-Evaluation-of-new-and-emerging-mine-water-treatment-technologies-Paques-Thiopaq-2000.pdf
67. Hydrogen Sulfide Capture and Removal Technologies: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Developments and Emerging Trends - ResearchGate, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361210071_Hydrogen_Sulfide_Capture_and_Removal_Technologies_A_Comprehensive_Review_of_Recent_Developments_and_Emerging_Trends
68. Chelate Iron H2s Regenerative Scrubber for Biogas Project - Catalyst and Gas Treating, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://mingshuo.en.made-in-china.com/product/WvwQXDSKyCUI/China-Chelate-Iron-H2s-Regenerative-Scrubber-for-Biogas-Project.html
69. Chelate Iron Micro Wet Desulfurization System for Biogas Plant - Catalyst, H2s Removal, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://mingshuo.en.made-in-china.com/product/CXZJlKkukNUD/China-Chelate-Iron-Micro-Wet-Desulfurization-System-for-Biogas-Plant.html
70. Chelate Iron Desulfurization H2s Removal Scrubber for Sulfur Recovery - Catalyst, Gas Treating | Made-in-China.com, accessed on April 8, 2025, https://mingshuo.en.made-in-china.com/product/MXOnveBcSCUr/China-Chelate-Iron-Desulfurization-H2s-Removal-Scrubber-for-Sulfur-Recovery.html
